Have you had enough?
Monday, July 18, 2005
 
ISLAMIC HIROSHIMA IS COMING TO USA

A few weeks after 9/11 I wrote a memorandum about the unimaginable events to come. I was not just criticized but some called me a lunatic. During the last presidential election I kept asking the question nobody dared to ask the candidates: What will you do when the Islamic atomic bomb explodes here? For months I proposed an answer to that question but nobody would even consider discussing it. Last week Rep. Tancredo on a radio program finally admitted that the bombing of Mecca may become inevitable.
On Sunday, the Houston Chronicle published a brutally frank article by a Pakistani professor.
OUR HIROSHIMA
Dropping the 'Islamic bomb'
An atomic attack on Fortress America by pious men with beards isn't a matter of if but when.
By PERVEZ HOODBHOY

Let his words speak for me:

“The New York Times reported that before the Sept. 11 attacks, the United States had intercepted an al-Qaida message that bin Laden was planning a "Hiroshima" against America.”
“Today, the United States lives in fear of the bomb it created, because the decision to use it has already been made. Pious men with beards will decide when and where on U.S. soil atomic weapons are to be used. Shadowy groups, propelled by fanatical hatreds, scour the globe for materials. They are not in a hurry. Time is on their side. They are doubtless confident they will one day breach Fortress America.”
“So what will happen when religious fanatics succeed in a nuclear attack? The world shall plunge headlong into a bottomless abyss of reaction and counter-reaction in a horror the human mind cannot comprehend.”
Some nuclear weapons experts say privately that it is not a question of if but when the attack will happen.
Who will the United States retaliate against? Will the United States nuke Mecca? The capitals of Muslim states?”
“What will the United States and its allies do as their people fear more attacks? Will they expel Muslims from the United States and Europe, or herd them into internment camps as was done to Japanese-Americans in World War II?”


Here are my words from one of the messages I sent out:
May 2002:
Our present strategy for survival is flawed. We are fighting not for the defense of our territory against an enemy who wants to conquer and occupy. What we are fighting for is defense of our way of life, threatened from within and by external enemies. It is useless to stand up against a foreign enemy if the internal enemies are overlooked. Enemies within will perpetrate sabotage and terrorism when the opportunity arises. If we do not recognize this, we are doomed.
In a war fought largely by means other than military power, our security no longer depends on our military capabilities, weapons systems or nuclear stockpile..
We are at war but we no longer are able to use wartime words such as "treason" and "subversion". It is hard to define "treason" as giving information to a foreign agent or country when you can give the same information with impunity to the media and get it publicized.
It is even harder to define "subversion" which is a systematic attempt to undermine society when such activity surrounds us in academia, the entertainment field and in the political arena, where politicians are willing to sacrifice national interests for political gain.
The consequences of unchecked terrorism can be devastating. People will feel insecure and soon will lose confidence in the police, the military and the government. The loss of confidence in the intelligence apparatus is the first domino to fall.
We are at war but we use words of containment and not of victory. We do have a "Homeline Security", a "Department of Defense", but we no longer have a "War Department" or even better an "Unconventional War Department". The duties of the UWD would be clear: Utilize subversion, disinformation, psychological war, espionage, terrorism, and guerilla war – in other words copy the methods of the enemy.
We are at war, but war usually requires sacrifice and reduction or suspension of the traditional liberties. First among them is the Freedom of The Media. Such suspension of freedoms in wartime is a necessity for survival. Standing in line at the airport to undergo symbolic but inane security checks is an inconvenience not a sacrifice. It is unfortunate that we have to wait for a major calamity and massive loss of lives before the politicians muster enough courage to speak out in support of such suspensions.
Like it or not, recognize it or not, we are in a war of survival with an enemy who does not want conquer our territory but wants to destroy our way of life and bring us down to his level of a Dark Age civilization. Their main weapons are the so-called martyr homicide bombers who will gladly exchange their substandard life on Earth for Paradise with rivers running with wine and eternal frolicking with 72 virgins.
We can not survive if we count only on our economic muscles and military strength. Survival is not of the fittest but the ones who can adapt to circumstance as water adapts to the vessel it is poured into. It is adapt or perish. In our politically motivated climate there is little hope of change until and unless another calamity occurs. When it does, you may quote this warning for your Monday morning quarterbacking.”
Long time ago I made a decision about the world. If there is to be a change, it was up to me. 437,000 Hungarian Jews waited for a leader to tell them what to do and then meekly went to Auschwitz and the gas chambers. How does that relate to us today? If you don’t feel it I will explain it later.
 
Friday, July 15, 2005
 
LONDON BOMBINGS

We are at war with Islam. Yes, there is a good Islam and a bad Islam. I know people of the Muslim religion. They are scared of their own fanatics and won’t dare to speak out. The mosques have been taken over by radical mullahs preaching hate and killing. There is no Muslim pope who can speak for all Islam but they are many top Muslim religious leaders who have endorsed the use of nuclear weapons against the US. Dr. Paul Williams is about to publish a book to prove that more than 20 nuclear suitcase bombs are already in the hands of thousands of terrorists living among us. They are preparing for a Hiroshima of the USA killing millions and aiming at our children at the instructions of Osama bin Laden.

This is not about Israel, the Palestinians, Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib, This the continuation of the thousand years Jihad as described in my book, THE DUAL PALINDROME. The proof is all around us. Our media refuses to publish it, our politicians are afraid to speak about it and we are meekly marching towards our extermination as the Jews of Europe marched into the gas chambers leaderless and clueless
A few days ago Mohammed Bouyeri, the murderer of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh stood in an Amsterdam court and defiantly pronounced
"I did what I did purely out my beliefs," clutching a Koran.
"I can assure you that one day, should I be set free, I would do the same, exactly the same." . . .
Then cruelly he faced the victim mother and said:
"I don't feel your pain. I have to admit that I don't have any sympathy for you. I can't feel for you because you're a non-believer."
He shot and cut the throat of the victim because Van Gogh produced a film depicting the mistreatment of Muslim women. This is religious terrorism by a follower and believer of the doctrine: kill the infidel.

I keep asking the same question and nobody dares to answer me. What will the US do when the nuclear weapons explode among us? Will we close the borders; deport illegals; introduce wartime censorship and martial law; put Muslims in concentration camps? Or will we keep asking why they hate us and surrender like Spain, hoping enough of us were killed to satisfy the terrorist beast? Will we just watch as Israel is destroyed and the Holocaust is repeated in a nuclear cloud? Will we be sufficiently jaded just to count the names of cities attacked hoping ours is not next? Will we fight a civil war with the Nation of Islam ex-convicts fully armed and terrorizing our families?
I must stop here because the picture is far worse than that. Have you had enough? What do you need blown up to wake up? Houston?
 
Monday, July 11, 2005
 
AMERICA NEEDS TO WAKE UP!

That's what we think we heard on the 11th of September 2001 (When more than 3,000 Americans were killed) and maybe it was, but I think it should have been "Get Out of Bed!" In fact, I think the alarm clock has been buzzing since 1979 and we have continued to hit the snooze button and roll over for a few more minutes of peaceful sleep since then.

It was a cool fall day in November 1979 in a country going through a religious and political upheaval when a group of Iranian students attacked and seized the American Embassy in Tehran. This seizure was an outright attack on American soil; it was an attack that held the world's most powerful country hostage and paralyzed a Presidency. The attack on this sovereign U. S. embassy set the stage for events to follow for the next 25 years.

America was still reeling from the aftermath of the Vietnam experience and had a serious threat from the Soviet Union when then, President Carter, had to do something. He chose to conduct a clandestine raid in the desert. The ill-fated mission ended in ruin, but stood as a symbol of America's inability to deal with terrorism.

America's military had been decimated and down sized/right sized since the end of the Vietnam War. A poorly trained, poorly equipped and poorly organized military was called on to execute a complex mission that was doomed from the start.

Shortly after the Tehran experience, Americans began to be kidnapped and killed throughout the Middle East. America could do little to protect her citizens living and working abroad. The attacks against US soil continued.

In April of 1983 a large vehicle packed with high explosives was driven into the US Embassy compound in Beirut When it explodes, it kills 63 people. The alarm went off again and America hit the Snooze Button once more.

Then just six short months later in 1983 a large truck heavily laden down with over 2500 pounds of TNT smashed through the main gate of the US Marine Corps headquarters in Beirut and 241 US servicemen are killed. America mourns her dead and hit the Snooze Button once more.

Two months later in December 1983, another truck loaded with explosives is driven into the US Embassy in Kuwait, and America continues her slumber.

The following year, in September 1984, another van was driven into the gate of the US Embassy in Beirut and America slept.

Soon the terrorism spreads to Europe. In April 1985 a bomb explodes in a restaurant frequented by US soldiers in Madrid.

Then in August 1985 a Volkswagen loaded with explosives is driven into the main gate of the US Air Force Base at Rhein-Main, 22 are killed and the snooze alarm is buzzing louder and louder as US interests are continually attacked.

Fifty-nine days later in 1985 a cruise ship, the Achille Lauro is hijacked and we watched as an American in a wheelchair is singled out of the passenger list and executed.

The terrorists then shift their tactics to bombing civilian airliners when they bomb TWA Flight 840 in April of


1986 that killed 4 and the most tragic bombing, Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988, killing 259.

Clinton treated these terrorist acts as crimes; in fact we are still trying to bring these people to trial. These are acts of war.

The wake up alarm is getting louder and louder.

The terrorists decide to bring the fight to America. In January 1993, two CIA agents are shot and killed as they enter CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

The following month, February 1993, a group of terrorists are arrested after a rented van packed with explosives is driven into the underground parking garage of the World Trade Center in New York City. Six people are killed and over 1000 are injured. Still this is a crime and not an act of war? The Snooze alarm is depressed again.

Then in November 1995 a car bomb explodes at a US military complex in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia killing seven service men and women.

A few months later in June of 1996, another truck bomb explodes only 35 yards from the US military compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. It destroys the Khobar Towers, a US Air Force barracks, killing 19 and injuring over 500. The terrorists are getting braver and smarter as they see that America does not respond decisively.

They move to coordinate their attacks in a simultaneous attack on two US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.. These attacks were planned with precision. They kill 224. Clinton's feeble America responds with cruise missile attacks and goes back to sleep.

The USS Cole was docked in the port of Aden, Yemen for refueling on 12 October 2000, when a small craft pulled along side the ship and exploded killing 17 US Navy Sailors. Attacking a US War Ship is an act of war, but we sent the FBI to investigate the crime and went back to sleep.

And of course you know the events of 11 September 2001. Most Americans think this was the first attack against US soil or in America. How wrong they are. America has been under a constant attack since 1979 and we chose to hit the snooze alarm and roll over and go back to sleep.

In the news lately we have seen lots of finger pointing from every high officials in government over what they knew and what they didn't know. But if you've read the papers and paid a little attention I think you can see exactly what they knew. You don't have to be in the FBI or CIA or on the National Security Council to see the pattern that has been developing since 1979.

The President is right on when he says we are engaged in a war. I think we have been in a war for the past 25 years and it will continue until we as a people decide enough is enough. America needs to "Get out of Bed" and act decisively now. America has been changed forever.. We have to be ready to pay the price and make the sacrifice to ensure our way of life continues. We cannot afford to keep hitting the snooze button again and again and roll over and go back to sleep.

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Admiral Yamamoto said "... it seems all we have done is awakened a sleeping giant." This is the message we need to disseminate to terrorists around the world.

Support Our Troops and support President Bush for having the courage, political or militarily, to address what so many who preceded him didn't have the backbone to do, both Democrat and Republican. This is not a political thing, this is an AMERICAN thing. This is about our Freedom and the Freedom of our children in years to come.

The talk is that we need a moderate third political party that is neither too conservative nor too liberal. What we need is a third party that will stop lying to the people and would put us on a war footing before we are destroyed by incompetence on one side and treason on the other.

Join the REVOLT PARTY!
 
Sunday, July 10, 2005
 
LETTER TO THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE
IN RESPONSE TO THEIR EDITORIAL ON JULY 11, 2005

Your editorial “State of Injustice” concludes: “Absent, amid the discovery of repeated and extensive miscarriages of justice, is a sense of public outrage and shame that our justice system could be so permissive of wrong and so indifferent to right.” A careful reading of the editorial reveals, however, that there is a reason for the lack of outrage and failure to remedy the situation. All segments of the criminal justice system are culpable and would prefer to keep their part of these atrocities hidden.

When we reorganized the Grand Jury Association 2 years ago, we were first appalled, then enraged by what we found out. Innocent people by the thousands may be incarcerated by a combination of deliberate fraud, negligence, political decision and unprofessional conduct. These include prisoners who, without ever seeing a jury, were compelled to plead guilty when faced with the "scientific" evidence.

When we proposed, that as a first minimum step of remedial action, the District Attorney should be sworn when presenting his case to the Grand Jury to make sure he is not knowingly misrepresenting the facts, we were rebuffed not just by the District Attorney, but ignored by the Criminal Justice Committees of the Legislature and the Governor.

We also realized that the Grand Jury system has been prostituted and has become a tool of the prosecution rather than a shield to protect the innocent. Many former grand jurors were nothing more than shills for the prosecution serving repeatedly and others were discharged by the time they started to recognize the problems. The Criminal Judges even prevented the Grand Juries to prepare reports of their findings so that subsequent juries could learn from such reports and not have to start ignorantly each 90 days.

The Grand Jury Association is now dormant for several reasons. Many members may feel guilty of having participated in sending thousands to prison by believing fraudulent crime lab reports. Others have been silenced by their relationship to the Judges and the District Attorney, which caused them to be appointed in the first place. Mostly we realize, however, that we are up against an entire flawed Criminal Justice System. Few people have the courage and conviction to face such odds. So we just live with the shame, because we know, better than most, what we should be ashamed of.
 
 
IMMIGRATION FOR THOSE WHO HAVE THE TIME AND CARE.
It is unfair to let you do the heavy lifting. I am sending you some opinions of others so that you realize that everyone, from morons up to geniuses, is discussing this issue. See what you think after reading these. I got much more if you want to be educated on the issue and really want to make a difference.

Here is a proposal by a smart guy:
1."Let's be radical for a moment. My solution to the immigration problem with illegals streaming uncontrollably over the US/Mexican is to offer Mexico a quasi-statehood designed such that Mexicans are allowed residency, free travel and work in the US if Mexico pays their medical and educational and unemployment costs as well as some hefty discount on Mexican oil and other resources the US would normally purchase from them. The US and Mexico could save huge amounts of money now dedicated to border surveillance and arrests and even amalgamate their policing and military efforts.

This same mechanism could eventually apply to Latin American and South American countries that wanted to participate. Each could strike deals with the US according to their sensibilities. These arrangements could persist while efforts were made to create economic climates approaching US standards of living via investments by international corporations who are already outsourcing to those same countries. The key of course would be to create an international agreement of wage and taxation schemes to regulate the flow of both labor pools and corporate profit.

The initial funds for this project would be considerable of course so it probably would be necessary to liquidate the top 1% of wealth owners in all countries concerned and use the confiscated wealth as seed money. There would be some outcry I suppose, but hey, its only 1 % of the population ...big deal."

Here is another:
2." Nobel laureate Gary Becker had a great idea: sell visas in the open market. We propose that the U.S. sell 5,000 visas every business day via a market such as NASDAQ or the Chicago Board of Trade. This would increase total immigrant flows. Sale of visas to felons or other undesirables could be prohibited. Some “free” visas could be given for humanitarian purposes in addition to those sold in markets in order to maintain our commitment to helping the less fortunate.

The purchasers of visas would in general be those with the greatest economic potential. Banks might make visa loans similar to guaranteed student loans. The proportion of immigrants with high skills or motivation would rise. A guess is that the government would take in at least $12 billion annually in visa revenues, which could be used for generalized tax relief, providing native-born Americans some tangible evidence of the gains from immigration. Many immigrants who now spend a long time waiting and $10,000 or more on immigration lawyers could get in sooner, with far less hassle and at no greater expense.

A less desirable but perhaps politically necessary use of visa funds would be to provide financial support for governments in areas with large immigrant influxes, hopefully to reduce the burden on local taxpayers. If necessary for passage, some funds could also be used for increased enforcement of immigration laws, accepting the proposition that laws, even misguided ones, should be enforced. Such a visa approach might win the support of liberals and free market conservatives wanting more immigration, as well as cultural conservatives wanting to “crack down” on illegal aliens. We would end up with more, highly productive immigration, and a lesser perception of “burden” on native born Americans."

Another smart-ass:
3."Here's a very simple way we can prevent illegal immigrants from coming over our border: arrest any person who employs illegal immigrants in violation of U.S. labor laws.

Because if illegal immigrants can't get jobs, they'll stop coming here.

But as long as people like Sam Walton's billionaire children keep hiring them, they'll keep coming.

So I say, lock up the Walton Gang; the Gallo Brothers; all those Hollywood celebrities who employ illegal aliens to clean their pools; all the mothers in my apartment building who hire illegal workers from Haiti to baby-sit their stupid children; George Bush's friends in Texas who own companies that rely on cheap labor to clean their Houston office towers and cut their lawns; the owners of Chicago's Toney restaurants who employ illegal alien Mexicans to wash dishes; and all the agri-company executives who run businesses throughout the Midwest employing illegal migrant Mexican workers.

Besides, the U.S. cannot afford to patrol our borders with the kind of manpower that many Republicans suggest because all our soldiers are overseas fighting wars and maintaining order in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, the west coast of Africa, Saudi Arabia, the Korean border, and Lord knows where else. Our "obligations" overseas prevent us from protecting our own country--until we bring back the draft.

Here is an official version:
4."The U.S. government realizes that the country faces an immigration problem. Since January 1, 2004, there have been approximately 20 million illegal immigrants in the country, according to www.theamericanresistance.com.

To rectify this problem Sen. Larry Craig wants to pass the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits and Security Act, or AgJobs.

This act will allow alien workers who have good work records to build their immigration status and become full U.S. citizens.

In conjunction with Schwarzenegger’s statement, “We can’t possibly seal off thousands of miles of borders and coastlines. But we can control them better and improve our homeland security,” Senator Craig stated in a Question and Answer session on his Web site.

“Thousands of AgJobs workers would be registered with and in a job program supervised by the federal government. This would be a major step forward toward a longer-term, more comprehensive solution.” Craig, said.

AgJobs will allow workers to establish citizenship as they work in the states.

The legal status will allow immigrants to have legal protection, higher wages and better travel conditions.

“Unlike the 1986 program - which was amnesty and was very different - our bill requires workers to provide documentary proof that they already were established here as farm workers - for example, tax records or employers’ records.” Sen. Craig said.

The senator feels the act will be a win - win situation for everyone."

And here is a smart liberal:

"It seems I’ve been doing so much responding to what I don’t like hearing about conservative’s complaints about immigration reform, I’ve barely stopped to think about exactly how I will fix the problem when I become the all-knowing, all-seeing emperor I know is my destiny. :-) Granted, I guess even I’m getting tired of listening to everyone, myself included complain about this growing schism. But I have to admit I find it pretty exasperating when others and myself are being called ‘liberals’ or apologists because we AGREE with President Bush on this issue! Not only that, but to be a ‘true’ conservative you need to line up behind Hillary friggin Clinton! Has the world gone topsy-turvy?

But many conservatives are even talking like liberals. Ratcheting up hysteria over a problem the facts don’t even support as even being a problem, and then begging for an even bigger and more intrusive government to fix said problem.

To me, a real conservative solution to illegal immigration would be one that does not have to increase the size of government, or increase the scrutiny of law-abiding citizens in order to find the lawbreakers. And I think we can do that, and have an effective solution …

a) Support law-abiding citizens watch groups like the Minutemen. They’ve both proven their effectiveness and their rational behavior in patrolling the border. They worked with law enforcement and did not act as law enforcement themselves. There is no way, despite many conservatives’ wet dreams, that we will ever completely secure our borders, or even come somewhat close. Eve if the impossible dream of securing our land borders was to be, we’d still have to worry about our water and air borders as well. But these citizens groups, when done in a RESPONSIBLE and non-vigilante way, as the Minutemen project has proven they can do, can be amazingly effective, and would certainly work better than creating a police state on our borders. Government size, intrusiveness, and cost would not increase, and we’d be fixing the problem ourselves instead of complaining and asking Big Brother to grow and fix it for us.

b) Support the Bush guest worker program. This program is an extremely forward-thinking idea, a radical new way of handling illegal immigration. It can provide a way for us to document those here to work, and will increase participation and involvement in our economy for those who come here looking to work hard and make themselves a better life. It can provide businesses a way to fill job openings and increase their productivity. Finally, it can also provide an avenue for hard working souls to become fully integrated into our country. We can also move them to the ‘back of the line’ behind people trying to come here the right way. And if you’ve ever had any experience with the INS, you know that ‘back of the line’ is not a small thing at all. :) Scott Peterson will have his reckoning day before those in the back of the line at INS do …

c) Support tax incentives for businesses building factories in Mexico … let’s face it, when people are talking illegal immigration, they’re basically talking illegal Mexican immigration. And if people don’t want them coming here to work, helping to increase the number of available jobs there is the only real way to stem the tide. Again, this one becomes a question of ‘what do you want?’ Do you want the jobs here, with people crossing the border to find any spare jobs? Or do you want the jobs down there, so they don’t cross the border to find them? Me, I’d rather have the jobs here, but maybe I’m alone in that wish.

The point here is clear though. The wave of illegal immigration will only slow when the economic conditions of the countries the immigrants are coming from improves. Even the founder of the Minutemen, James Gilchrist, sees the truth of this, calling these people not invaders, but ‘economic refugees’, as this openly hostile and nutty article admits.

None of this is rocket science. I don’t know why so many people don’t seem to get it though.”

5.Senator S.I. Hayakawa of California came up with a proposal for legalization that strikes us as one of the most practical so far. He suggested that each migrant deposit $250 (which is less than the going price for being smuggled into the U.S.) with the Mexican government, to be held in interest-bearing bonds. In exchange, the migrant would be issued a travel document entitling him or her to a six-month visa. The deposit would be returned only if reclaimed within the six-month period, and the worker would then be eligible for another visa the following year.

A system of this sort would be beneficial to both countries. It would offer temporary employment to Mexicans, thus relieving their nation's unemployment pressures while-at the same time encouraging the return of many laborers who would have acquired the kind of skills needed in a developing country. It would not encourage workers to stay in the U.S. and bring their families, as ironically closing the border would do. It would provide American employers with the low-cost, hard-working labor they want . . . and help prevent the abuse of those workers. It would also avoid the need for the police-state enforcement of immigration laws. And, by satisfying needs on both sides of the border, the plan would help improve relations between the United States and Mexico.

6.Which are the possible solutions? First is to do nothing and believe me or not, this was the option taken by every previous administration in Washington since late 1980s when president Reagan made an amnesty. If this course continues, the illegal immigrants will increase in number and in proportion. It seems that some sections of American public opinion favor this option of doing nothing. Second solution is to try to do something and one of the possible options is to catch and deport every illegal alien, those that have entered the country illegally and those that have stayed beyond their travel, student or other temporary visas.

With all due respect for the laws in America I don't think such solution is technically feasible. Imagine that all these 15 million are caught detained and are waiting for extradition. Without proper papers their country of origin is unclear. Many of them look like Mexicans but in fact up to half of all illegal immigrants come from other countries. Waiting for months to be deported following even the quickest judicial procedures, the American taxpayers will have to pay the whole bill from the search through detention, procedures and deportation. Let's assume that the bill for every case amounts to $10,000, thus the whole operation may cost up to $150 billion.

The effect will be that the United States will become a perfect police state, where the government may track everyone, everywhere. Not knowing where exactly to deport the illegal aliens, the authorities will throw them into Mexico, creating suddenly a humanitarian earthquake of biblical proportions. There is at least one more practical objection that should be considered before applying this radical measure. If the number of illegal aliens is 15 million this means that in the United States there are 7-8 million jobs that couldn't be fulfilled even if all unemployed Americans suddenly decide to take them. These 7-8 million vacant jobs will be like a magnet for new illegal immigrants and the catch-catch game will have to start again.

There seem to be at least two solutions for this problem. One will be to import back this time legally 7-8 million foreigners; the other is to export these jobs abroad. The same strategy should be applied to any new job in the country that can't be taken due the demographic decline expected in the years to come.

I don't think all the above mentioned measure are pure nonsense, but if the American society wants to deport 15 million or if it wants to keep the situation as it's now, it should be aware of the consequences of such decision.
 
Friday, July 01, 2005
 
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
So you are upset about illegal immigration? Which part is upsetting you, since there are many facets to this problem? Mexican laborers coming over; terrorists invading the country; armies of dope gangsters and their cargo; criminals returning to kill, rob and molest after they have been deported; women to give birth to American babies; Chinese, African, Asian and Arab groups paying high smuggling costs; and the list goes on. You are right. We should stop them at the border. All of them, or perhaps not the workers we need?
Short of restarting the draft we could not protect our border with sufficient military or border guard personnel. Our military was crippled during the last Administration. You approve of the draft? You are willing to have your children serve a few years in the service of their country? Good for you. No current politician would ever propose to do so and stay in office or get re-elected. Do you think any army would be able to stop the dope traffic? Just remember the rumrunners of the Prohibition and the fortunes they built. We even had a president who was elected through the rum-running fortune of his family.
Now for the rest of the problem. What do we do with 8-10 million illegals now in the country?
How do we identify them? How do we take their properties away and deprive their American citizen children from support? Could the State take over supporting them while you forcibly march the parents to the border Nazi style or fly them back to Mexico? Assuming Mexico would allow the planes to land and we could manage 1000 jumbo jet flights per month taking them back, it would take more than 3 years. Do you think the ACLU and the trial lawyers and the Mexican Government and the UN and the Latino community and all the bleeding hearts would idly stand by and watch such a totalitarian act? Would you?
If you are TV or radio host you can mouth off all day about the problem and never face the consequences of your wild suggestions.
Perhaps we should invade and occupy Mexico and make it into Puerto Rico #2? Why wait until there are enough illegals here that are allowed to vote due to the Clinton Motor Voter scam and let them take over the government by abusing the democratic process we so nobly advocate throughout the world?
If you did not get the point by now it is this: You are entitled to your opinion but you are not entitled to ignore the facts when forming your opinion. The worst of the facts is that you have no idea of the scope of the problem; neither have you slightest idea of a solution.
I hear so many solutions that are bordering wishful thinking at best and idiocy at worst. National ID Cards, punishing employers, or other scam would do so much more damage than good and would not stop the illegal immigration or solve the problem of those who are here. Our problem is much bigger than the illegal worker from Mexico.
We are at war and the enemy is among us waiting to strike. Solve that problem and many of the above issues will fade away. Let us reason together and find something we could try. We have a cancer that has spread and seems unstoppable. Howling at the moon won’t help.
 
The insane are running the asylum. Examples permeating American society today. Scams, fraud, perjury, uncivilized behavior and other signs heralding the fall of the USA, unless you had enough.

ARCHIVES
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 / 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 / 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 / 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 / 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 / 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 / 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 / 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 / 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 / 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008 / 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008 / 01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009 / 04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009 / 07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009 / 10/01/2009 - 11/01/2009 / 06/01/2010 - 07/01/2010 / 09/01/2010 - 10/01/2010 /


Powered by Blogger